MEGADROUGHT: Is a new dust bowl on the way?

https://www.newstarget.com/2021-05-29-megadrought-new-dust-bowl-on-the-way.html

Much of the Western United States is currently under severe “megadrought” conditions that some speculate could turn into the next dust bowl.

Lack of precipitation is causing farmers to be cut off from irrigation supplies, which means no water for crops and eventually no food in the grocery store – not to mention bankruptcies and other associated fallout.

Dry conditions also mean increased wildfire risk. As you may recall from last year’s bone-dry conditions, wildfires were off the charts in California, and could be even worse this year with the way things are going.

Experts are already predicting that this year’s wildfire season will be unlike anything this country has ever experienced. In fact, some are warning of “permanent drought” conditions that could become the norm every single year.

“Extreme drought across the Western U.S. has become as reliable as a summer afternoon thunderstorm in Florida,” one report explains.

“And news headlines about drought in the West can seem a bit like a broken record, with some scientists saying the region is on the precipice of permanent drought.

Even during the 1930s “dust bowl” that we all read about in the history books, there was still hope that eventually rain would come. This time around, some are talking about permanent drought as though it will become the “new normal.”

Without water, America will starve

Normally, the West would see bouts of high precipitation throughout the winter season to help keep things moist once summer arrives. This past winter season, however, there was very little wetness to be had.

Much of the Southwest and large swaths of California saw as little as 25 percent of the normal rainfall for the season. This bodes ominous for this part of the country as it enters the hot summer season.

Last summer was also one of the driest and hottest on record with two historic heat waves combined with a summer monsoon cycle that never occurred. This is why the wildfires raged last summer, and will probably do the same or worse this upcoming summer.

At the California-Oregon border, the situation is also dire. Farmers throughout the region say lack of rain combined with federal officials shutting off their water supply is creating disastrous growing conditions.

“In what is shaping up to be the worst water crisis in generations, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation said it will not release water this season into the main canal that feeds the bulk of the massive Klamath Reclamation Project, marking a first for the 114-year-old irrigation system,” reports explains.

“The agency announced last month that hundreds of irrigators would get dramatically less water than usual, but a worsening drought picture means water will be completely shut off instead.”

Oregon Gov. Kate Brown recently issued a drought emergency, as did California Gov. Gavin Newsom. Keep in mind that both of these states, and especially California, grow most of the country’s fruits and vegetables.

California’s Central Valley, where many other food staples are grown, is likewise dry as a bone. Some farmers in the region are actually destroying their crops ahead of the summer season in order to allow other crops to survive.

This means less food, fewer jobs, and potentially bare grocery store shelves in the coming months.

Then there is Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah, which are currently seeing the worst drought conditions since the Drought Monitor first began tracking soil moisture content back in 2000. Officials say drought conditions in these states are the worst they have ever been in at least the past 120 years.

More related news about America’s impending doom can be found at Collapse.news.

Sources for this article include:

thewashingtonstandard.com

NaturalNews.com

is known as 'Darren Deleon' or is called 'Pastor Darren' (17)

I, ‘darren...’ on Aug. 6, 1976 was ‘born again’ (John 3:3) by publicly declaring[1]Jesus’ as my ‘Lord’, ‘Judge’, ‘King’ (Isaiah 33:22; John 18:37). My natural, primary allegiance[2] is to God only as my reciprocal obligation and my repudiation & expatriation of any earthly government, nation, society or ruler. Secondly, my contingent allegiance is to my neighbor (‘state’ means the ‘people’) by divine commandments[3] and acts of obedience. The U.S. Supreme Court declared "there is a higher loyalty than loyalty to this country, it is loyalty to God"[4] and “allegiance cannot be due to two sovereigns[5]. By divine commandments, “No one can serve two masters”, Matthew 6:24; “We must obey God rather than man”, Acts 5:29. Maxim: “That which is against Divine Law is repugnant to society and is void”. This declaration again corrects and merely modifies with additional citations, ab initio, any prior presumption (false or correct) of my personal allegiance, citizenship, nationality, society, domicile and consent to a domestic or foreign sovereign or government.  

I, ‘darren...’, based on my religious beliefs, do not owe any allegiance (primary or contingent, political or otherwise), reciprocal obligation, patrocinium, fealty, duty, function, etc. to any country, nation, king, queen, pope, president, judge, ruler, flag or earthly government and its agencies including the United States[6], jointly or severed, or to a Defacto State (as a political sub-division of United States) as repudiated herein and as declared by the U.S. Supreme Court[7]. The American civil legal system is based on freedom which no government has the power to ‘command until one binds himself to it’, “for lex (law) since it binds one to act” and cannot demand allegiance except by one’s consent[8]. Maxim: “An act done against my will is not my act”.  Maxim: ‘Consent makes the law’.

I, ‘darren…’ do not owe any allegiance, loyalty, fealty, submission, obedience, duty, performance, reciprocal obligation, debt, debit, dues, balance, obligation, liability, arrearages or have granted consent [by contract] to any Federal or State Defacto government and their agencies or to the public but owe all to almighty God, (Acts 5:29, Matt 22:15-22 “Give to God, what is Gods’”). See: “He owes no such duty to the State, He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights”. Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 (1906). See also:  ‘Man verses The State’ (1884); ‘The Right to Ignore the State[9] by Herbert Spencer [philosopher, anthropologist, sociologist].

[1]Whosoever therefore shall confess me before men, him will I confess also before my Father which is in heaven”. Matthew 10:32, Luke 12:8, Romans 10:9, Revelation 3:5.

[2] See: Genesis 49:10; 1 Kings 12:27; 1 Chronicles 12:29. 29:24; 2 Chronicles 15:14-15, 30:8, Isaiah 19:18; 45:22-23; Ezekiel 17:18-21, 21:23; Acts 17:7; Romans 14:11; Galatians 6:12-16; Hebrews 13:15; Revelation 13:3.  See also: U.S. v. MacIntosh, 283 U.S. 605 (1931) – defendant’s allegiance to the will of God; U.S. v. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163 (1965); allegiance cannot be due to two sovereigns”, Talbot v. Janson, 3 U.S. 133 (1795). Maxim: “That which is against Divine Law is repugnant to society and is void”.

[3] In Matthew 22:35-40: ‘And one of them, a lawyer as an expert in the law, asked a question to test Him. “Teacher, which is the great commandment in the Law?” Jesus said unto him, “You shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all your soul and with all your mind. This is the first and greatest commandment (Primary allegiance). The second is like it: Love your neighbor as yourself (contingent allegiance). "On these two commandments depend the whole Law and the Prophets". See also: “We must obey God rather than man” Acts 5:29.  “No one can serve two masters” Matthew 6:24, Luke 16:13.

[4] U.S. v. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163 (1965). "there is a higher loyalty than loyalty to this country, it is loyalty to God"

[5] Talbot v. Janson, 3 U.S. 133 (1795). “allegiance cannot be due to two sovereigns

[6] Joaquin A. Peignand v. Immigration & Naturalization Svc, 440 F.2d 757 (1st Cir. 1971) one does not have to be a citizen but merely owe his allegiance to the United States.

[7] U.S. v. MacIntosh, supra (ft. nt. 1) ; U.S. v. Seeger, supra (ft. nt. 3); Passports [22 U.S.C. 212 - ‘..those owing allegiance, citizens or not, to the U.S.’];

[8] See: Galatians 5:1; See also: "For in reason, all government without the consent of the governed is the very definition of slavery." Jonathan Swift (1745).

[9] See: ‘The Right to Ignore the State’ Herbert Spencer - 1. The Right to Voluntary Outlawry. “Every man has freedom to do all that he wills, provided he infringes not the equal freedom of any other man, then he is free to drop connection with the state - to relinquish its protection, and to refuse paying toward its support. It is self-evident that in so behaving he in no way trenches upon the liberty of others; for his position is a passive one; It is equally self-evident that he cannot be compelled to continue one of a political corporation, without a breach of the moral law, seeing that citizenship involves payment of taxes; and the taking away of a man's property against his will, is an infringement of his rights. Government being simply an agent employed in common by a number of individuals to secure to them certain advantages, the very nature of the connection implies that it is for each to say whether he will employ such an agent or not. He cannot be coerced into political combination without a breach of the law of equal freedom; he can withdraw from it without committing any such breach; and he has therefore a right so to withdraw”. 6. On Civil and Religious Liberty – “The liberty to worship God in the way that seems to him right, is a liberty without which a man cannot fulfil what he believes to be Divine commands, and therefore conscience requires him to maintain it."…“The claims to ignore the state in religious and in secular matters are in essence identical.”

Leave a Comment